• Home
  • Ahem
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2010 -2011
    • 2008 – 2009
    • 2004 – 2007
  • Op-eds and articles
  • Creative Writing
  • Folio
  • Services
    • Project Management
    • Consulting
    • Copywriting
  • References
ClementClement
ClementClement
  • Home
  • Ahem
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2010 -2011
    • 2008 – 2009
    • 2004 – 2007
  • Op-eds and articles
  • Creative Writing
  • Folio
  • Services
    • Project Management
    • Consulting
    • Copywriting
  • References
Slay the Jabberwock

Slay the Jabberwock

5. September 2016 Op-ed

“Twas brillig, and the slithy toves / Did gyre and gimble in the wabe: / All mimsy were the borogoves, / And the mome raths outgrabe.”

Peer review is widely viewed as an essential step for ensuring scientific quality of a work and represents a cornerstone of scholarly publishing. On the other hand, those involved in the publishing process are often driven by incentives which may undermine the quality of published work.

Influence over the peer review process is real power, and not one that should be used lightly or for reasons of financial gain. But there are hundreds of “predatory publishers” that hardly review the papers they charge to publish, and sometimes undertake no review at all. But the veneer of credibility that an author gets by being published in a peer-reviewed journal starts to disappear as soon as the peer review process stops being trustworthy.

A text corpus is a large and structured collection of scientific texts used to do statistical analysis and hypothesis testing, checking occurrences or proving linguistic rules within a specific language.

Text corpora are the main knowledge base in several linguistics skills, including speech recognition and machine translation. Corpora and frequency lists derived from them are also useful for language teaching.

About a decade ago, some MIT students wrote a programme that randomly picked out clauses from a scientific text corpus. It then arranged the words in a syntactically correct way, although actual meaning was eliminated, making the text read like a nonsense piece of writing by Lewis Carroll. They used the text for submissions to a conference at which they suspected low submission standards to exist.

The article was accepted for presentation and thus was launched the SCIgen project.

Researchers have now taken another shot at the peer reviewing process by making randomly generated nonsense and fake reviews of actual published articles. The nonsense reviews were also accepted for publication.

While the algorithm “cannot possibly deceive any rigorous editorial procedure,” according to the researchers, it definitely works if the editor skim-reads the text (or doesn’t read it at all). The need for real writers, real editors and real reviewers in literature, research and scientific writing cannot be stressed enough. This is why the jabberwock must be slain.

https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/archive/scigen/#examples

(Jabberwocky illustration by John Tenniel)

Share
0

You also might be interested in

TITBITS HYPERSENSITIVITY BIGGLES

Jun 30, 2016

Ahem When Alli and Gwen were enjoying Venice for a[...]

FORSWORE WORSTED INTERNECINE: January 2022
Barbara Hepworth's Family of Man, Yorkshire Sculpture Park

FORSWORE WORSTED INTERNECINE: January 2022

Jan 30, 2022

Ahem The year started new-pin-brightly, with a hangover-free park run[...]

VIBRANT PEDICURE MOSAICS

Oct 30, 2016

Ahem The mornings and evenings are becoming increasingly colder, measured[...]

Archives

Categories

  • Creative Writing (3)
  • Folio (11)
  • Ahem (213)
    • 2021 (12)
    • 2022 (4)
    • 2020 (12)
    • 2019 (12)
    • 2018 (12)
    • 2017 (12)
    • 2016 (12)
    • 2015 (12)
    • 2014 (12)
    • 2013 (12)
    • 2012 (12)
    • 2010-11 (24)
    • 2008-09 (24)
    • 2004-07 (39)
  • Op-ed (58)
  • Portfolio (8)
  • Services (6)
  • Blog (17)
    • Archive (1)

Contact Us

We're currently offline. Send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Send Message

About

Lionel Stanbrook is an editor, diarist, journalist, writer, re-writer, word designer, and content creator. This site contains the best of Lionel’s articles, prose, poetry, blogs, musings and perspectives, as well as a writer’s folio, a recent CV (perhaps the most creative part of all his work), and the monthly diary Ahem, written about his personal life, work, travel, emotions and experiences since 2004.

Contact

Call +44 (0)7734 970163

Email: cjlcs50@gmail.com

 

Posts

Ahem Gallery

Family Gallery

Latest Posts

PUMMELLING OBLOQUY ESCARPMENT: April 2022

PUMMELLING OBLOQUY ESCARPMENT: April 2022

1. May 2022

Ahem Ant and Susanne, the magnificent Miles from Luxembourg,...

DISCOMBOBULATED GRANDILOQUENT JURY: March 2022

DISCOMBOBULATED GRANDILOQUENT JURY: March 2022

1. April 2022

Ahem Our dogs have not been well. Both Bonnie and Max have...

FITBIT HOBBLING PIDDLE: February 2022

FITBIT HOBBLING PIDDLE: February 2022

2. March 2022

Ahem A small section of the road outside the house was...

© 2004 - 2022 · Lionel Stanbrook. All rights reserved.
Site design, hosting and management by MEGANWEB

Prev Next